blown motor (Tib)

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by RC, Jun 22, 2008.

  1. RC

    RC Guest

    Hi,
    My son bought a new Hyundai Tiburon in 2004 with a 10 year/100,000 warranty. 4
    years and 70,000 miles later the motor blows ( hole in engine block near timing
    chain and oil all over the highway). The last couple of years he
    did a lot of mod's to it...... headers, exhaust, air intake, computer chip. Did
    he void his warranty with these mod's?
    Haven't talked to the stealership yet,.... just getting a feel for the shit
    storm that could be coming.

    Thanks for any input,
    RC
     
    RC, Jun 22, 2008
    #1
  2. RC

    mack Guest

    :Let me make a wild guess. YES, of course it voids his 100,000 mile
    warranty. It's not the original equipment that the manufacturer supplied
    when the car was new. If I were the Hyundai folks, I'd turn down the
    warranty claim flat. sorry.
     
    mack, Jun 22, 2008
    #2
  3. What storm? He certainly voided the warranty with all those mods so there
    will be no arguments. He probably drove it often in the high rpm range too.
    I'd not warrant a car like that for five minutes. Please though, take the
    car to the dealer, they can use a good laugh.
     
    Edwin Pawlowski, Jun 22, 2008
    #3
  4. RC

    Mike Marlow Guest

    I would guess that replacing the chip would violate his warranty, if nothing
    else does. That one seems like kind of a no-brainer.
     
    Mike Marlow, Jun 22, 2008
    #4
  5. RC

    DaToteman Guest

    Here this might help; In essence no the parts won't void the warranty,
    however they will most likely claim that the after market parts caused the
    damage and I do believe that there has been some concern over the Tib V6 2.7
    having a weak block.. (4 boil main). I do not have all of the particulars
    but should be easy to find out.

    Will adding aftermarket performance products void my car's factory
    warranty?
    U.S. Federal law sets forth requirements for warranties and contains a
    number of provisions to prevent vehicle manufacturers, dealers and others
    from unjustly denying warranty coverage. With regard to aftermarket parts,
    the spirit of the law is that warranty coverage cannot be denied simply
    because such parts are present on the vehicle, or have been used. The
    warranty coverage can be denied only if the aftermarket part caused the
    malfunction or damage for which warranty coverage is sought. Disputes in
    this area usually boil down to arguments over facts and technical opinions,
    rather than arguments over interpretations of the law.




    1.The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2302(C))

    This federal law regulates warranties for the protection of consumers.
    The essence of the law concerning aftermarket auto parts is that a vehicle
    manufacturer may not condition a written or implied warranty on the
    consumers using parts or services which are identified by brand, trade, or
    corporate name (such as the vehicle maker's brand) unless the parts or
    service are provided free of charge. The law means that the use of an
    aftermarket part alone is not cause for denying the warranty. However, the
    law's protection does not extend to aftermarket parts in situations where
    such parts actually caused the damage being claimed under the warranty.
    Further, consumers are advised to be aware of any specific terms or
    conditions stated in the warranty which may result in its being voided. The
    law states in relevant part:

    No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or
    implied warranty of such product on the consumers using, in connection with
    such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided
    without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by
    brand, trade or corporate name... (15 U.S.C. 2302(C)).

    http://www.ipdusa.com/Will-adding-a...products-void-my-cars-factory-warranty/fi-28/
     
    DaToteman, Jun 23, 2008
    #5
  6. Changing the chip alters the performance curves and that alone would be
    enough to void the warranty. Anything adding to a stronger fuel charge,
    higher RPM, higher shift points and the like would cause more stress than
    the original engine design allows.
     
    Edwin Pawlowski, Jun 23, 2008
    #6
  7. RC

    Mike Marlow Guest

    I believe Hyundai would find it quite easy to state, and likely support,
    that parts like the chip are not merely aftermarket parts, and as such are
    not protected by Mangnuson-Moss. Like kind and quality sneaks into the
    picture, as does the issue of technical specifications.
     
    Mike Marlow, Jun 23, 2008
    #7
  8. RC

    Hal Guest

    My son bought a new Hyundai Tiburon in 2004 with a 10 year/100,000 warranty. 4
    My advice would be to buy a good used motor from the local wrecking
    yard and pay a local shop the $600 or so to install it for you. And
    drive nicely afterwards, unless changing engines is your idea of fun.
    In addition, your son needs to admit to himself that he drove the hell
    out of the car and broke it.

    Hot rodding wears and breaks things, as happened here. 70,000 miles of
    hot-rodding is a pretty good run, all things considered, and I don't
    see how Hyundai should be responsible for your son's desire to go fast
    and stress his vehicle beyond its design limitations.

    Good luck with it.

    Chris
     
    Hal, Jun 23, 2008
    #8
  9. RC

    hyundaitech Guest

    He cranked up the power beyond the limits the motor could withstand ove
    time, and it blew up. I seriously doubt any dealership would fix thi
    under warranty.

    These cars are *very* fast when performance modifications are done. Bu
    remember that with race tuning comes race lifespan
     
    hyundaitech, Jun 23, 2008
    #9
  10. RC

    DaToteman Guest

    I agree that the total sum of aftermarket performance parts caused the
    engine to blow. I was just making the point that actually installing them
    does not automatically void the warranty. Installing performance parts is a
    murky area when it comes to failures and what is covered or not.
     
    DaToteman, Jun 24, 2008
    #10
  11. RC

    mack Guest

    the young man could have saved himself a lot of money by not installing all
    the goodies, but simply by using 100 octane aviation gas.........with the
    same result of great performance and short engine life.
     
    mack, Jun 24, 2008
    #11
  12. RC

    RC Guest

    Thank you very much for all your input, much appreciative. Your right...warranty
    is void with all the stuff he did to it ( not to mention welding the headers on
    ). Going to take Hal's advice. Get a 2.7 from bone yard, pay someone to swap...
    and life goes on. If you want to play your
    going to pay! lesson learned.... Thanks again.

    Ron Clark
     
    RC, Jun 25, 2008
    #12
  13. RC

    Mike Marlow Guest

    Welded the headers on???? It may have been a stupid idea, but if your son
    welded the headers on (successfully), then he's at least talented.
     
    Mike Marlow, Jun 25, 2008
    #13
  14. RC

    mack Guest


    Perhaps just a little TOO talented for the sake of his (or Dad's) wallet.
     
    mack, Jun 29, 2008
    #14
  15. RC

    Matt Whiting Guest

    I'd say it is pretty much guaranteed that be voided his warranty and
    likely also ruined his engine.

    Matt
     
    Matt Whiting, Jul 1, 2008
    #15
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.