chinese car chery will overcome hyundai and kia.

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Chinacarforums, May 31, 2006.

  1. Chinacarforums, May 31, 2006
    #1
  2. Chinacarforums

    JS Guest

    Hell they haven't even caught up with Suzuki or Isuzu yet.

    After seeing the absolute lack of quality on Chinese-built GM parts,
    then looking into the past and looking at the absolutely shit cars
    communists have built in the past, I have to conclude anybody that isn't
    spraying for mosquitoes or attempting suicide to stay the hell out of
    these cars. The US DOT and EPA and insurance industry agreed, hence why
    that junk isn't on our roads.

    JS
     
    JS, May 31, 2006
    #2
  3. Chinacarforums

    Mooron Guest

    I depends what is meant by "soon". Maybe in another 10 years
    the Chinese will have a car worth buying. As of now, they have
    serious problems with quality and emissions control.

    - Mooron
     
    Mooron, Jun 1, 2006
    #3
  4. Chinacarforums

    PM4HIRE Guest

    It will be a solid 15 years before the communist produce
    a car that's at the level of today's Hyundai. Remember
    what the Nissans and Hondas were like?

    Tom who drives an Accent
     
    PM4HIRE, Jun 1, 2006
    #4
  5. Chinacarforums

    news Guest


    finally, the disposable car

    they might come in two or three pack
     
    news, Jun 2, 2006
    #5
  6. Chinacarforums

    news Guest


    they will have a tremendous impact..

    on head injuries, leg injuries, deaths...
     
    news, Jun 2, 2006
    #6
  7. Chinacarforums

    news Guest


    Malcolm Bricklin's involded too, and you know what happens every time he
    tries to make cars............

    he gets richer and the dealers loose everything.....
     
    news, Jun 2, 2006
    #7
  8. Chinacarforums

    news Guest


    "A chicken in every Pot, and a Turkey in every Garage"

    Dave 2006
     
    news, Jun 2, 2006
    #8
  9. Chinacarforums

    news Guest



    John Dinkel was quoate as staying
    "cars from china will be 30-40% cheaper, and will have Lexus like quality"

    loosely translated...
    "We'll slap an Armani Suit, on a Yugo"
     
    news, Jun 2, 2006
    #9
  10. Its hard to compare a Yugo, to a Chery. Chery is much more advanced,
    with modern funding, resources, engineering and a giant market.

    All that is needed is a little more funding towards Safety.

    We will see Chery make it far, if china is to be next superpower...then
    it has to produce top companies in every sector including auto!
     
    Chinacarforums, Jun 4, 2006
    #10
  11. Chinacarforums

    JS Guest

    Asians have been programmed for too many generations to simply follow
    commands. These kinds of people are absolutely useless for building and
    designing innovative products. Unless China can steal someone else's
    technology, they're simply stuck.

    There are bad sides to this. Chinese industry (since they're a
    communist country you must consider all industry there the government's)
    will pay tons of money for stolen technology from anywhere else.
    Aproximately 5 years ago China stole a formula to make electrolytic
    capacitor 'goop', and instead of doing any long term testing they rushed
    parts to market (often badging them with Japanese manufacturer
    logos/labels) which generally failed within 6-18 months due to chemical
    breakdown - they had an incomplete version of the formula.

    Recently a bunch of NEC parts (I've personally seen the optical drives)
    were cloned in china and badged with NEC labels. They "mostly" work,
    but have outrageously annoying bugs and do not accept flash loads from
    legitimate NEC firmware download sites...

    More info, see here: http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/3000

    But, China does have a whole lot of slave labor (communism) so getting
    things done there is fairly cheap - at least on parts where quality
    isn't a major concern (thats why General Motors outsources part building
    there - quality isn't even a concern)

    JS
     
    JS, Jun 5, 2006
    #11
  12. Chinacarforums

    news Guest


    As long as China is run by a bunch of tyrants, they have nothing to offer
    this world.
    The true SAD part is, 75+ % of the Chinese people will still live in
    poverty, oppressed, have no say in the political process. persecuted, jailed
    without due process and God knows how many people have been ruthlessly
    killed.
    SHAME ON China's government.
     
    news, Jun 9, 2006
    #12
  13. Chinacarforums

    news Guest


    this is probably the scariest and sickest of them all..

    even prescription drugs are being dumped on our shores.
    http://www.asianresearch.org/articles/1465.html

    http://www.newsgd.com/news/China1/200605150065.htm
     
    news, Jun 9, 2006
    #13
  14. Chinacarforums

    Robert Cohen Guest

    An olde person w/some memory of his enjoyable state university
    economics course circa early-mid 1960s:

    A respected university economics professor, whose son I coincidentally
    had known in grammar school, lectures to sophomore econ students:

    Loosely:

    "The Japanese (or maybe he just said "foreigners") can't out-do us in
    automobiles...."

    And this is something Americans once generally thought--not so long
    ago.

    There is little to no doubt in my mind that the Chery (with that
    shameless name knockoff) or whatever brand name shall succeeed.

    Thus my holding: It is not the least bit impossible to think that a
    Chinese car and/or
    perhaps truck will
    be a normative U.S. import within five--ten years.

    There was a cliche that people sort of awesomely* scoffed-at

    CHINA HAS THE POTENTIAL OF FIVE JAPANS

    "awesome" is the word that first comes to my mind, but I admit it here
    is oxymoronic--any suggestions for a better modifier of "scoffed?"
     
    Robert Cohen, Jun 11, 2006
    #14
  15. Chinacarforums

    JS Guest

    China is too busy trying to screw everyone over to even keep up with one
    Japan.

    What do you expect from communists?

    JS
     
    JS, Jun 12, 2006
    #15
  16. Chinacarforums

    news Guest

    and look at what happened to the Japanese.......(history repeating it self.)
    still trying to recover from a 10+ year economic downturn.
    the 80's where many (including myself) that believed the Japanese were
    taking over the US.
    They bought out land at outrageous property values.. (they soon learned
    their lesson)
    The US is NOT stupid (in spite of what some might think)
    for many reasons, they wont be allowed to grow bigger than the US
    (economically or defensively)

    As long as the Japanese have a "democratic society" (or as long as "inset
    any country here" has a "democratic society) It can stand a chance in the US
    for a fair chance at competing for the best product.
     
    news, Jun 12, 2006
    #16
  17. Chinacarforums

    Robert Cohen Guest

    At <alt.philosophy & alt.history>, me & other pswados & gratuitous
    fools have been arrogantly/condescendingly/stupidly expounding upon the
    aspect of synthesizing & combining Chinese authoritarianism with market
    capitalism.

    Here's the thread that an Hyundai-owner lead-off and then it went into
    argumentative tangents & off-the-walls, including my bashing of WW II
    Sweden's collaboration because an articulate Swede insulted my posting
    style's usual confusion & unorthodox ineptness.

    From: Robert Cohen - view profile
    Date: Tues, May 30 2006 8:59 pm
    Email: "Robert Cohen" <>
    Groups: alt.philosophy, alt.history
    Not yet ratedRating:
    show options


    Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
    original | Remove | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author


    I've discussed this observation at least twice-- it's not anything I've

    consciously plagarized.

    So, why not drum it redux/some more.


    The Chi Coms of the 21st century are throwing egg foo poo poo into the
    ideology of my West, and I want to observe this point once again.


    What do I mean?


    Well, you've got to be 61 years old, I suppose, to get the irony, but,
    damneit, I fucken am.


    The biggest bug-a-boo or fear of my childhood's 1950s was duck 'n cover

    from the Red Meanace.


    Polio was second: I got a Salk version shot in 1956, and apparently
    that vaccine wasn't alive, and so I'm lucky.


    Some unlucky sugar-cube swallowers apparently did get polio from that
    ....modality/technique/experiment/practice of Sabin's version.


    And now, back to fear of the Reds:


    Believe me: I was here: COMMUNISM, both Russian & Chinese, is what
    drove the international news & politics in the USA for at least 60-70
    years.


    If only them thar Commies would be capitalists like us, then ....what a

    wonderful world this would be.


    Today, they're seemingly eating U.S. capitalism's breakfast, lunch and
    dinner, as I post this in late spring of 2006.


    If you happen to read it in the later twenty-first century, then please

    be aware that the leading superpower now governing in Beiping/Peking
    (not Illinois) was once thought to be hopelessly entrenched in
    non-capitalism and thus tragically backward regressing.


    The US political sages & pundits of the prior century are--or should
    be--today in shock.


    Do not believe whole hog in half the cow-crape implication in civic
    club speeches & economics textbooks, such as: "if China were to become
    a market capitalist nation, then ...peace/nirvana," because
    conventional wisdom/ideas/paradigms are established to eventually
    collapse, as Thomas Kuhn kind of explains.


    I may be distorting & exaggerating the nuances & subtleties of the
    political-economic rhetoric of times past.


    Some would think I've missed enough of the substance too.


    Therefore, it will take better articulated analyses than mine to
    explain/capture an amazing change.


    Reply »
     
    Robert Cohen, Jun 12, 2006
    #17
  18. Chinacarforums

    news Guest

    sound like bunch of rhetoric.. pseudo-(insert whatever here)


    At <alt.philosophy & alt.history>, me & other pswados & gratuitous
    fools have been arrogantly/condescendingly/stupidly expounding upon the
    aspect of synthesizing & combining Chinese authoritarianism with market
    capitalism.

    Here's the thread that an Hyundai-owner lead-off and then it went into
    argumentative tangents & off-the-walls, including my bashing of WW II
    Sweden's collaboration because an articulate Swede insulted my posting
    style's usual confusion & unorthodox ineptness.

    From: Robert Cohen - view profile
    Date: Tues, May 30 2006 8:59 pm
    Email: "Robert Cohen" <>
    Groups: alt.philosophy, alt.history
    Not yet ratedRating:
    show options


    Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
    original | Remove | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author


    I've discussed this observation at least twice-- it's not anything I've

    consciously plagarized.

    So, why not drum it redux/some more.


    The Chi Coms of the 21st century are throwing egg foo poo poo into the
    ideology of my West, and I want to observe this point once again.


    What do I mean?


    Well, you've got to be 61 years old, I suppose, to get the irony, but,
    damneit, I fucken am.


    The biggest bug-a-boo or fear of my childhood's 1950s was duck 'n cover

    from the Red Meanace.


    Polio was second: I got a Salk version shot in 1956, and apparently
    that vaccine wasn't alive, and so I'm lucky.


    Some unlucky sugar-cube swallowers apparently did get polio from that
    ....modality/technique/experiment/practice of Sabin's version.


    And now, back to fear of the Reds:


    Believe me: I was here: COMMUNISM, both Russian & Chinese, is what
    drove the international news & politics in the USA for at least 60-70
    years.


    If only them thar Commies would be capitalists like us, then ....what a

    wonderful world this would be.


    Today, they're seemingly eating U.S. capitalism's breakfast, lunch and
    dinner, as I post this in late spring of 2006.


    If you happen to read it in the later twenty-first century, then please

    be aware that the leading superpower now governing in Beiping/Peking
    (not Illinois) was once thought to be hopelessly entrenched in
    non-capitalism and thus tragically backward regressing.


    The US political sages & pundits of the prior century are--or should
    be--today in shock.


    Do not believe whole hog in half the cow-crape implication in civic
    club speeches & economics textbooks, such as: "if China were to become
    a market capitalist nation, then ...peace/nirvana," because
    conventional wisdom/ideas/paradigms are established to eventually
    collapse, as Thomas Kuhn kind of explains.


    I may be distorting & exaggerating the nuances & subtleties of the
    political-economic rhetoric of times past.


    Some would think I've missed enough of the substance too.


    Therefore, it will take better articulated analyses than mine to
    explain/capture an amazing change.


    Reply »
     
    news, Jun 12, 2006
    #18
  19. Chinacarforums

    Robert Cohen Guest

    more impertinent re-posted fantasies & ibecillicisms:

    6 From: Robert Cohen - view profile
    Date: Fri, Jun 2 2006 9:50 am
    Email: "Robert Cohen" <>
    Groups: alt.philosophy, alt.history
    Not yet ratedRating:
    show options


    Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
    original | Remove | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author


    To get back to China:

    This NYT article shows that the people are certainly aware of China's
    growth & economic progress.


    The Party does not allow glasnost, and is apparently successful in
    maintaining the political order.


    Some of us old enough would recall that the 1970's Nixonian &
    enlightened liberal American theme or slant of the "recognition of Red
    China," and have observed its amazing massive
    "re-capitalization"/"re-capitalism" thereof would ...have hoped for
    that eventual/subsequent liberalization of its internal political
    culture.


    Tout le monde is still waiting for that glasnost, including their
    jailed dissidents & ex-patriates; but the brutal Tinamen
    Square-ization maintains as Chinese Hobbesians & authoritarians &
    prevailing Reds implicitly aren't unhappy.


    Hey: The best hopes of men & mices get way-laid &


    10. rattle around in cribs & diaper pails
    9. are aka as t-r-a-g-e-d-i-e-s & absurdities & unintended
    consequences
    8. reaffirm that cynics' ole favorite, "told ya so"
    7. the future is now, and it's too slow to matter, because in the long
    run, we're all...
    6. Deng, Dung....Jimmy Carter, Oprah, Uma....meet...market disciplined
    capitalism with chronic political authoritarianism: an impossible
    synthesis that actually works
    5. Mao, that smiling despot gets to smile vs Tom Jefferson's gets the
    wooden nickle
    4. Hey, is all we can do about this is to get another terrific tax cut,

    GWB?
    3. And to sell 'em that Valadimir Lenin rope factory to hang our own
    asss
    2. How do they cuss in Chinese? "Fungu-la-poo-poo-up-yours,
    Occidentals"
    1. Yeah, I do like to joke: do you know of something less serious than
    the decline of the West?


    Reply »

    7 From: Robert Cohen - view profile
    Date: Fri, Jun 2 2006 9:53 am
    Email: "Robert Cohen" <>
    Groups: alt.philosophy, alt.history
    Not yet ratedRating:
    show options


    Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
    original | Remove | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author


    http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-usa-china-survey.html

    Reply »

    8 From: neal sandman - view profile
    Date: Fri, Jun 2 2006 11:08 pm
    Email: neal sandman <>
    Groups: alt.philosophy, alt.history
    Not yet ratedRating:
    show options


    Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
    original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author



    This tells me that China is not, now, a world power. See also,

    http://www.nixoncenter.org/publications/articles/may_china&world.htm
    http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html


    Reply » Rate this post: Text for clearing space

    9 From: Roger Johansson - view profile
    Date: Sat, Jun 3 2006 2:32 am
    Email: "Roger Johansson" <>
    Groups: alt.philosophy, alt.history
    Not yet ratedRating:
     
    Robert Cohen, Jun 13, 2006
    #19
  20. Chinacarforums

    Mooron Guest

    Robert Cohen wrote:

    <snip>

    I have no doubt the Chinese will eventually be big in the
    US car market. I think the five to ten years is pushing it,
    it will probably be more like ten to fifteen.

    - Mooron
     
    Mooron, Jun 15, 2006
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.