Z
Hyundai-Chrysler, doesn't have the same ring to it that Daimler-
Chrysler does.
Rev. Tom Wenndt said:I also wondered why Hyundai would want anything to do with an albatross
like Chrysler.
But the article makes it clear that Hyundai's aim is their"coveted" dealer
network.
Actually, I can see that, as long as Hyundai doesn't get the misconception
there is anything else worth having in that company.
I dunno....maybe we all have outdated experiences with Chrysler......my '94
full sized van was an excellent trruck FWIW.....the late model 300's "seem"
nice.
Rev. Tom Wenndt said:I also wondered why Hyundai would want anything to do with an albatross like
Chrysler.
But the article makes it clear that Hyundai's aim is their"coveted" dealer
network.
Actually, I can see that, as long as Hyundai doesn't get the misconception
there is anything else worth having in that company.
Matt Whiting said:You are quite wrong here. Chrysler still has strong engineering and
design capability. Their main lack over the years has been in
manufacturing/assembly, an area where the Koreans have been fairly strong
in the last couple of decades. I think this could be a very strong
marriage done properly.
the last Chrysler product I owned was a 1985 Plymouth Reliant. Worst piece
of crap I ever owned. Never again! had four other Plymouths before that
that were marginally OK!