R
Robert Cohen
An interesting review.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/11/automobiles/autoreviews/11AUTO.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/11/automobiles/autoreviews/11AUTO.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Robert said:
hyundaitech said:I think everyone now is actively trying to manipulate customer satisfaction
and even reliability scores.
hyundaitech said:I think everyone now is actively trying to manipulate customer satisfaction
and even reliability scores.
Well wouldn't that be the idea - to make the customer happy? I know
its a rather odd thought, especially if you've ever been around a
Chrysler dealer.
JS
Yeah, but they are manipulating the satisfaction scores on the initial
product by BRIBING the customer with free oil changes, accessories or
whatever. You could make the argument that those free items ARE making the
customer more satisfied, but more than likely they are skewing the results
of initial quality and satisfaction reports.
Bob said:My sales lady offered me a free fill up if I would show her my
questionnaire. She said nothing about whether the ratings had to be good.
Maybe there is an implied quid pro quo, but I didn't feel there was.
JS said:Well wouldn't that be the idea - to make the customer happy? I know its
a rather odd thought, especially if you've ever been around a Chrysler
dealer.
Bob said:My sales lady offered me a free fill up if I would show her my
questionnaire. She said nothing about whether the ratings had to be good.
Maybe there is an implied quid pro quo, but I didn't feel there was.
My sales lady offered me a free fill up if I would show her my
questionnaire. She said nothing about whether the ratings had to be
good. Maybe there is an implied quid pro quo, but I didn't feel there
was.
So just why else would she want to see the survey? Bob, you really
aren't THAT naive are you?
The idea is typically to evaluate the initial quality of the car, not
the quality of the bribes from the dealer. I've yet to see a J.D. Power
"dealer bribe" satisfaction index, yet that is essentially what is being
measured at my Hyundai dealer.
Matt's right. Maybe not in your particular case. But dealers offer bribes
regularly, and customers accept them regularly.
Matt's right. Maybe not in your particular case. But dealers offer
bribes regularly, and customers accept them regularly.
In my case, had I not been happy with the initial quality (it took more
than 6 weeks to get the survey in the mail) I would have rejected the bribe
offered and filled out and mailed the survey for myself.
I just write that so I don't sound like a complete idiot for letting them
fill it out for me. I was, and still am, extremely happy with my Sonata.
And my bribe was an oil change. I normally do them myself, so taking it to
the dealer was actually more of a hardship as far as time and energy are
concerned. I did want to see what, if anything, I was missing by not using
their service.
Bob said:My only survey to date was to rate my dealer service. I recently got an oil
change for $28, and Hyundai sent me a survey. I will fill it in honestly and
mail it. I may just do it on the Internet, but then, I get no free gas. That
seems like wasting perfectly good gas to me!
Matt, be careful. Bribery takes 2. If you are accusing bribery, you are not
only accusing the dealers of offering bribes, but you are also accusing the
owners of accepting them. I for 1 take that a little bit personally. Were
you offered a bribe? If so, did you take it? What makes you think other
owners have less integrity than you?