Oil change intervals

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Ed Pawlowski, Jan 24, 2010.

  1. Ed Pawlowski

    Ed Pawlowski Guest

    Oil change intervals are often discussed here. A study was done by
    the CA Department of Toxic Substances Control. Shows that most of us
    are changing too soon, wasting money.


    http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/TechnologyDevelopment/OPPTD_FLY_High-Efficiency-Oil-Filters.cfm

    Oils, filters, engine design has advanced considerably yet the oil
    change places still try to sell you on 3000 miles. I'm still
    advocating 7500 in most cases (per the manufacturer) just to avoid any
    warranty hassles if anything comes up.
     
    Ed Pawlowski, Jan 24, 2010
    #1
  2. Ed Pawlowski

    John Guest

    I,ve always figured $30-$40 for oil/filter every 4000 miles is a darn sight
    cheaper than risking a new engine every 80,000 miles.
    John
     
    John, Jan 24, 2010
    #2
  3. Ed Pawlowski

    Ed Pawlowski Guest


    A lot of people figure that way. Your money, your choice, but it is
    not needed. How many people do yo know that have had oil related
    engine failures in the past 20 years? Probably none.
    I'd agree with your idea, but I've put up to 180,000 miles on engines
    with a 7500 mile change interval. Never a problem.

    Take $35 a change at 4000 versus 800 miles. You did 20 changes while
    I've done ten. That is $350 I have to spend on vacations, tools, beer,
    whatever.
     
    Ed Pawlowski, Jan 24, 2010
    #3
  4. Ed Pawlowski

    Voyager Guest

    That is what those selling oil want to you think. The reality is that
    with today's engines (no lead in the gas, tight tolerances, much less
    excess fuel being burned, etc.) there is no risk to the engine with
    changes at 5,000 to 10,000 miles depending on driving conditions. So,
    you are spending extra money for NO reduction in risk to the engine.

    Actually, I would argue almost the opposite today. By using more oil
    filters per mile, you are taking more risk of getting a defective
    filter. And each change carries the risk of human error in replacing
    the drain plug and oil filter and either done improperly risks loss of
    oil and subsequent catastrophic engine failure. My father had an old
    filter gasket get left on the block and the new filter placed over it.
    It started to leak and fortunately he caught it before it ruined his 454
    Chevy engine. That would have been an expensive repair indeed.

    So, I believe that more frequent changes today in all likelihood
    increase the risk to your engine rather than reduce it.

    However, I also admit to having the same irrational concerns as you. I
    use Mobil 1 oil, but still change my oil at 5,000 mile and 10,000 mile
    intervals. I use the former for engines under warranty and typically up
    to about 100,000 miles unless, like my truck, they are not driven often
    (5,000 miles per year on my truck). For cars driven a lot (my wife's
    minivan), I change at 10,000 mile intervals. I suspect even my 5,000
    mile intervals are conservative, but in the case of my truck this is
    still only one change a year and time is a factor also.

    The other reason I use 5 and 10 rather than 7.5 is that I can easily see
    when the next change is due. With 7.5 you have odd intervals like 22.5
    and 37.5 and they just aren't as easy to catch by eye as are 5, 10, 15,
    20, etc.

    Matt
     
    Voyager, Jan 24, 2010
    #4
  5. Ed Pawlowski

    Plague Boy Guest

    <snip>

    Well, I used to change my oil every three months, because I
    didn't drive 3K in the same period or less. Since many of my
    vehicles were given me by somebody who wouldn't change the oil
    even yearly (10-15K, I figured it was good to "de-toxify" the
    engine anyhow <g>.

    Some of my high-milage cars would dirty up the oil pretty
    quickly from piston blow-by or whatever. The two I have
    now,though the oil is still clear when I change it at three months.
    So now, I'm not seeing too much point in changing my oil every
    three months, so I do it every six. I'd say I put 1-2K miles per
    year on each car at this point.

    Any comments on letting the oil "sit" in the engine? I know
    water can condense in the crankcase, but that's going to happen
    whether you change the oil or not; I try to drive each car a
    reasonable distance each month so the motor can be fully warmed
    up for an hour or two.

    The 2002 Sonata I would be more willing to invest the money for
    oil changes. The 1992 Sentra with 177K on it, I suspect was
    driven for 2-3 years (about 40K) without any oil changes and it's
    still running. I suspect it will still be running when I send it
    to the crusher because the body has totally rotted through.
     
    Plague Boy, Jan 24, 2010
    #5
  6. Ed Pawlowski

    Voyager Guest

    Interesting that you replied to my post, but did not include anything
    that I posted.

    Yes, a worn engine will dirty the oil faster, but the color of the oil
    is not a good indication that it is ready to change. Oil can be quite
    black and still be doing its job well.

    As opposed to taking it out of the engine? I'm not sure what you mean
    by letting it sit. Do you mean not running the engine at all? If you
    plan to leave the engine in storage for a long period of time (more than
    a month or so), then I would put in fresh oil and run the engine briefly
    to circulate the fresh oil through the engine. Leaving dirty oil in the
    engine for a long time will allow the acids formed from combustion to
    start corroding internal parts. Fresh oil helps slow down this process.

    This is precisely why changing the oil every 3,000 miles is such a
    waste. Modern engines invariably outlast the car they are in, unless
    you live in the desert. And even then the sun usually trashes the paint
    and interior parts long before the engine dies.

    Matt
     
    Voyager, Jan 24, 2010
    #6
  7. Ed Pawlowski

    Plague Boy Guest

    I originally left more of the previous post, but wound up
    snipping it...
    Well, I'm not *storing* either car...I'm just not *using* them
    very much. Given the amount I drive each car (1-2Kmi yr.) should I:

    1. Change the oil every three months, even though it's like new?

    2. Change the oil every six months, even though some acids may be
    sitting in the engine?

    3. Change the oil yearly, because I'm not driving the car enough
    to create acids in any appreciable quantity?
    Yes, three months seems wasteful. Six months seems a good
    compromise, but I don't know how much acid would build up over a
    year, even though it would logically be less than the levels most
    people would have on an average.
     
    Plague Boy, Jan 24, 2010
    #7
  8. Ed Pawlowski

    Voyager Guest

    I would probably go 6 months and depending on how you rack up the 1-2K
    miles a year, I would consider 12 months. My last two motorcycles
    (1200cc touring bikes) had a mileage interval and a one year time
    interval and their engines are very similar to automotive engines (4
    cylinder, liquid cooled, etc.).

    If your mileage is accumulated by driving less than 5 miles each day,
    then I would change at no more than 6 month intervals and even consider
    staying at 3 months. If the mileage is accumulated by driving 30 miles
    once a week, then I would go the full year.

    The bigger concern I believe is running the car often enough to burn off
    the moisture in the oil.

    I think the acid build-up will depend on your driving regime as
    mentioned above. If you have two cars and are driving this little, it
    might make sense to consider selling one and driving the other twice as
    much! :)

    Matt
     
    Voyager, Jan 25, 2010
    #8
  9. Ed Pawlowski

    Zotto Guest

    It always sounded strange to me the frequent oil change that usually
    U.S. people do.
    Here in Europe Hyundai says to have oil change in his vehicles every
    15.000 Km (a bit less than 10.000 miles) or once a year, while other
    brands (like Bmw) , using long life oils , tell to change it every
    30.000 Km. (about 18700 miles).
    Considering also that here we have smaller engines (that are subject
    to more fatigue), change every 4000 miles are really a waste, unless
    to use a very bad oil.

    Zotto
     
    Zotto, Jan 26, 2010
    #9
  10. Ed Pawlowski

    John Guest

    Truth be known I agree with you re it being excessive. The amount of debate
    though makes me cautious. Perhaps overly so. There is a website titled "Bob
    is the Oil Guy" (www.bobistheoilguy.com) where there is much discussion re
    oils and how much zinc etc has been taken out of modern oils. How the layman
    works out the correct answer????. Probably placebo effect but I,ll stick
    with the more frequent oil changes.
    John
     
    John, Jan 27, 2010
    #10
  11. Ed Pawlowski

    Gio Guest


    I think the relative high cost of lubricating mineral and of late synthetic
    oils here in Europe compared to the low price in the US makes oil changes a
    cheapish option for the folk in the US to change. It is after all is the
    lifeblood of and engine and its cost is minute when compared to a
    replacement or engine overhaul. Renault use a 20,000 mile oil change
    interval - or two years- in the UK I believe.
    I think the question should be asked if the high cost of premium synthetic
    oil in an everyday engine is worth the cost when compared to a cheaper but
    more frequent mineral oil change. Myself, I opt for more frequent lower
    cost semi synthetic oils.

    Gio
     
    Gio, Jan 27, 2010
    #11
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.