Sirius or XM Oughta Have Deal With Hyundai

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Robert Cohen, Nov 17, 2003.

  1. Robert Cohen

    Robert Cohen Guest

    It appears the satellite radio companies do not yet have an arrangement with
    our make.

    This is not to be critical, merely constructive & suggestive

    XM has deal with GM etal

    Sirius has deal with Daimlier (sp?), Ford and possibly others

    not all the models of the above manufacturers are eligible, and i presume they
    just don't think hyundai people are prospects

    well, i would disagree with such assumption

    hyundai owners are amongst the most discriminating and best informed, and the
    luxury & pleasure of satellite radio is now within the realm or reality or
    grasp of an adaptive hyundai consumer

    Sirius seems to have the most non-music choices, but is something like only one
    in nine sales of the satellite thingees

    XM reportedly has sold a million so far

    Sirius reportedly has only sold about 150,000

    i think i might do sirius, because too much music is much too music, and sirius
    apparently has LESS COMMERCIALS !

    what the marketeers oughta do is have ancient ole euro classical music as
    continuous background to talk & news, but that might be tooooooo compli-cat-ed
    to engineer, though it's reported we went to the moon or sumthin in 1969 (but
    that was maybe because of the Tang in the space ship's fuel tank)

    for further info:

    please see the nice article in today's major Atlanta newspaper:

    http://www.ajc.com
     
    Robert Cohen, Nov 17, 2003
    #1
  2. I drove a (rental) Cadillac around Illinois a few weeks back and,
    after getting used to XM I really like it. Whether I like it
    $120/year's worth remains to be seen. For those who don't know, some
    of it is X rated, they have a bluegrass channel--something for about
    everyone.

    Fred, W8OY
     
    Prefered Customer, Nov 19, 2003
    #2
  3. Robert Cohen

    Jason Guest

    The Playboy Channel costs extra each month and is not part of the
    $10/mo fee.
     
    Jason, Nov 19, 2003
    #3
  4. Robert Cohen

    Nikoli Yetti Guest

    I respectfully disagree. One big reason is the fact that one has to pay for
    it monthly. I think it is bad enough we pay for television. I remember
    when I was younger, and would ask my parents "why do we have to have
    commercials?" My parents would explain so we don't have to pay for
    television. Now we pay for it, and have alot more commercials. I remember
    when cable t.v. was commercial free. I see the same thing happening to
    Satellite radio. Also digital radio is on the horizon, which is supposed to
    offer a better product for free. Another thing is that I believe that we as
    Hyundai owners watch our money more carefully that other car owners; and I
    am guessing that most Hyundai owners would not be willing to pay for radio.
    This is not meant to be a flame, just an opinion. I will admit that
    Satellite radio has caught on more than I thought it would. I would've
    thought the public would be outraged at the suggestion we pay for radio.
     
    Nikoli Yetti, Nov 19, 2003
    #4
  5. You're certainly correct. But there are arguments for it. One
    argument is that there is no outlet in my area for my favorite music
    style. A second is that most FM stations are, for competitive
    reasons, smashing and slashing their transmitted audio until what you
    head has little to do with what went on the record, tape or CD
    originally. XM is certainly using gain leveling and peak clipping but
    it is done so as to be, in general, below the annoyance threshold.

    XM has commercials and they are (probably) what will make XM have
    enough cash in hand to overtake and crush Sirius, the competing
    service. They are as annoying on XM as they are on commercial radio.
    But on commercial radio, there is no subscription fee to cover
    overhead so they must, have to, no choice but to sell and deliver at
    least twelve minutes of commercials per hour. Another way to say this
    is that you do not pay for commercial radio directly--but you do pay
    for it in the costs of annoyance and through the higher cost of
    products that you buy. So, given that you pay for your music no
    matter what, the only choice left is how you want to pay.

    One thing that you can use to argue against XM or Sirius is how far
    north you live and in how rural or urban an area. If the antenna
    cannot "see" the satellite, there's no signal. Inside the receiver
    there's a buffer circuit that holds about seven seconds of music in
    reserve in case you drive through a "hole" in the coverage. In large
    cities and along major routes, both Sirius and XM are using technology
    similar to cell phones to fill in holes. When you get into small-town
    America, the repeaters aren't there yet. When you get into rural
    America, same problem. A drive along a country road in rural West
    Virginia, down between the mountains, and you're not going to have
    service. The Sirius high-apogee system means you much more likely to
    have service with them no matter where you go than with the
    geo-stationary satellites (Rock and Roll) used by XM; much more
    likely--but not guaranteed.

    Fred, W8OY
     
    Prefered Customer, Nov 19, 2003
    #5

  6. After driving a rental car with Sirius, I got the XM Sky-Fi kit and
    put it in my Elantra. I haven't listened to local radio for over a
    month.
     
    Mitchell Kaufman, Nov 20, 2003
    #6
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.