I
irwell
If not, what would be your choice?
irwell said:If not, what would be your choice?
irwell said:If not, what would be your choice?
If not, what would be your choice?
If not, what would be your choice?
irwell said:If not, what would be your choice?
irwell said:If not, what would be your choice?
Rev. Tom Wenndt said:I won't argue that GM's are catching up fast. But, being a recovering GM
apologist, I can tell you they are still nowhere's near where they have to
be to start being competitive again.
Still way too many problems I can only define as "GM'isms." I have an '03
Oldsmobile, and I, for one, am not seeing near the improvements I need to
yet.
Domestics are only slowly and begrudgingly starting to try to address their
3rd-rate powertrains - like the one currently in the Equinox (do not see why
someone would think that vehicle is perfect for them). And GM's continue to
have some of the worst seats in the industry.
Now GM has just recently come out with a new 3.6L V6, being matched to
either a 5- or 6-speed transmission. This is looking like a seriously good
powertrain, but up until now, they are refusing to put it into vehicles like
the Equinox (though it is now in the Equinox-based Suzuki XL-7).
But until they get more history, and more of a dedicated willingness to do
these kinds of things, right now Hyundai runs circles around GM.
And Hyundai, by the way, is the only car company that Honda is taking
seriously - and Hyundai and Honda are the two companies GM is studying the
most for "how to do it right."
Obviously he should have had Toyota first or second.That is pretty dumb since Toyota is clearly the leader in almost every
front in the auto industry. It is pretty sad when the car companies
can't even figure out who is in first.